are birds killed by windmills

Countless studies have shown that climate change will cause far-reaching and devastating impacts to wildlife and humans alike. Renewable energy development is a critically important component of the transition away from fossil fuels, making our air cleaner and reversing the effects of climate change. Unfortunately, we have also learned that wind energy development has a substantial negative impact on birds.

A Google search can turn up a wide array of answers to this question, with a nearly fivefold difference between the smallest and largest estimates.

The truth is, it has been a while since these estimates were updated, and the wind energy industry has grown a lot in the meantime. So, we thought it was time to take a close look at the numbers, and see what a current estimate might look like.

The best estimates of the number of birds killed by wind turbines in the U.S. each year are based on a trio of studies published in 2013 and 2014, all reporting on data from 2012. Each study was unique in its methods, resulting in varying estimates. (There is actually a fourth paper just to compare their methods.) The results from these studies are provided in the table below.

Rather than going down the proverbial rabbit hole to decide which study might be the most accurate, lets take the average of the results from these studies. This gives us an estimate of approximately 366,000 birds killed by wind turbines in the U.S. in 2012.

Its important to consider that wind energy capacity has grown considerably since then. The study by Loss and others reported that there were 44,577 turbines in operation in 2012, while the U.S. Wind Turbine Database indicates that there are 65,548 today — an increase of 47 percent. Adjusting for this industry growth, we can project that approximately 538,000 wind turbine-caused bird deaths occur in the U.S. each year.

However, projecting mortality based on energy produced is more frequently used because it accounts for the size of turbines in addition to their numbers. The American Wind Energy Association reports that there were 60,067 megawatts (MW) of wind energy capacity in the U.S. in 2012, versus 111,808 as of this writing in 2021 — an 86-percent increase. Taking this change into account, it can be projected that approximately 681,000 birds are currently killed by wind turbines in the U.S. each year.

These estimates likely underestimate the true extent of the problem due to the fact that many bird fatalities escape human detection.

Consider that small songbirds are the most abundant birds in the U.S., and are the most frequently killed by turbines. A study published in March 2020 found that dogs located 1.6 and 2.7 times as many small bird fatalities as human monitors did at two wind sites in California. This was true even after attempting to correct for searcher detection error, which is a standard practice for such studies.

The Erickson study reported that 62.5 percent of the birds in their data set were small birds. Taking 62.5 percent of the 681,000 annual mortality estimate calculated above and adjusting this with the 1.6- and 2.7-fold multipliers from the dog search study (and adding the other 37.5 percent of birds back in), this would translate into a total of 936,000 and 1.4 million birds based on the numbers from the two sites. Averaging the two, this would suggest that 1.17 million birds are killed by wind turbines in the United States each year.

In addition to the bird fatalities discussed above, wind power projects also cause important indirect effects that must be considered.

For example, many wind facilities are located far from the existing power grid and require the construction of new powerlines, which are yet another source of bird mortality.

In a 2014 study, researchers estimated that 25.5 million birds are killed each year due to collisions with powerlines, and another 5.6 million are killed by electrocutions. Therefore, powerlines built exclusively to connect new wind facilities to the existing energy grid result in additional bird mortalities that should be factored in to the total toll in birds associated with wind energy development.

Wind facilities also require relatively large areas of land. Facility development can fragment or otherwise alter habitat in ways that make it unsuitable for species that have historically been present. For example, a study at wind facilities in the Dakotas found displacement effects for seven of nine grassland bird species after one year. While these effects have been documented in various studies, they have yet to be broadly quantified.

When the facts above are considered, it becomes clear that existing estimates of the toll of wind energy development on birds are narrowly considered and do not account for the industrys full impact.

It should be noted that the estimates above are imperfect, as they are based on studies derived from an incomplete data set.

While most wind facilities are required to conduct bird surveys to inform project planning and post-construction bird mortality studies, they are unfortunately not always obligated to share their data, and many companies maintain a proprietary hold on this information. If these data were made publicly available, bird mortality could be better understood and conservation prescriptions could be tailored accordingly.

On a similarly important note, the species being negatively affected by wind turbines must be considered. Some species are more susceptible than others to collisions with wind turbines, and some have slower rates of reproduction and thus their populations may be more dramatically affected by losses. Some of our rarest and most iconic species, including California Condors and Marbled Murrelets, fit this bill and are at risk of collisions with wind turbines. Others like Whooping Cranes are losing habitat as a result of wind energy development.

As noted above, our projections leave little doubt that the annual toll in birds lost to U.S. wind turbines is at least more than half a million, and a similarly conservative estimate would put that number at nearly 700,000 birds. There is a case to be made that the number could exceed 1 million. And for multiple reasons stated above, these are all likely to be under-estimates.

Regardless of the specifics, this is far too many when one considers the many other threats to birds on the landscape, and the massive declines we have already seen in our bird populations.

Whats the solution to this conundrum? How do we continue to add wind turbines to fight climate change when this development is harming birds? Our answer: Bird-Smart Wind Energy. Smart wind energy development starts with good data collection and appropriate siting to avoid high-risk areas for birds. Available measures can then be incorporated to further minimize risks, and impacts should always be offset by solid on-the-ground mitigation measures.

American Bird Conservancy has been working to minimize the impacts to birds from wind energy development for more than a decade. By ensuring that this development is done right, we can realize the benefits of renewable energy while protecting our vulnerable bird populations.

Want to learn more?

Check out this wind and solar power-related episode of MIT’s “Today I Learned: Climate” podcast.

View these related Explainers, authored by MIT and other scientists and experts.

Your contribution will be matched dollar-for-dollar. Act by December 31!

Numerous studies have demonstrated that both humans and wildlife will suffer greatly as a result of climate change. The development of renewable energy is a vital part of the shift away from fossil fuels, which will clean our air and reverse the effects of climate change. Regretfully, we have also discovered that the development of wind energy has a significant detrimental effect on birds.

But just how many birds are killed by wind turbines?

There are many different responses to this question that can be found through a Google search, with the difference between the smallest and largest estimates being almost five times.

Actually, a lot has happened in the wind energy industry since these estimates were last updated, which was quite some time ago. Therefore, we believed it was time to carefully review the data and determine what a current estimate might entail.

The best estimates of the number of birds killed by wind turbines in the U.S. each year are based on a trio of studies published in 2013 and 2014, all reporting on data from 2012. Each study was unique in its methods, resulting in varying estimates. (There is actually a fourth paper just to compare their methods.) The results from these studies are provided in the table below.

Table 1. Estimates of annual bird mortality from collisions with wind turbines in the U.S.

Instead of delving too far into the hypothetical to determine which study is the most accurate, let’s take the mean of these studies’ findings. This provides us with an estimate of the number of birds killed by wind turbines in the United S. in 2012.

Its important to consider that wind energy capacity has grown considerably since then. The study by Loss and others reported that there were 44,577 turbines in operation in 2012, while the U.S. Wind Turbine Database indicates that there are 65,548 today — an increase of 47 percent. Adjusting for this industry growth, we can project that approximately 538,000 wind turbine-caused bird deaths occur in the U.S. each year.

However, projecting mortality based on energy produced is more frequently used because it accounts for the size of turbines in addition to their numbers. The American Wind Energy Association reports that there were 60,067 megawatts (MW) of wind energy capacity in the U.S. in 2012, versus 111,808 as of this writing in 2021 — an 86-percent increase. Taking this change into account, it can be projected that approximately 681,000 birds are currently killed by wind turbines in the U.S. each year.

These estimates probably don’t reflect the full scope of the issue because a large number of bird deaths go unreported by humans.

Consider that small songbirds are the most abundant birds in the U.S., and are the most frequently killed by turbines. A study published in March 2020 found that dogs located 1.6 and 2.7 times as many small bird fatalities as human monitors did at two wind sites in California. This was true even after attempting to correct for searcher detection error, which is a standard practice for such studies.

The Erickson study reported that 62. Small birds made up 5% of the birds in their data set. Taking 62. 5% of the 681,000 annual mortality estimate that was computed earlier, and modifying this using the 1 6- and 2. seven-fold multipliers from the study on dog searches (plus the additional 37 5 percent of birds returning in), which adds up to 936,000 and 1 4 million birds according to data from the two locations. Averaging the two, this would suggest that 1. In the United States, wind turbines kill 17 million birds annually.

Apart from the previously mentioned bird fatalities, wind power projects also result in significant indirect effects that need to be taken into account.

For instance, a lot of wind farms need to build new powerlines since they are situated far from the current power grid, which is another reason why birds die.

In a 2014 study, researchers estimated that 25.5 million birds are killed each year due to collisions with powerlines, and another 5.6 million are killed by electrocutions. Therefore, powerlines built exclusively to connect new wind facilities to the existing energy grid result in additional bird mortalities that should be factored in to the total toll in birds associated with wind energy development.

Wind facilities also require relatively large areas of land. Facility development can fragment or otherwise alter habitat in ways that make it unsuitable for species that have historically been present. For example, a study at wind facilities in the Dakotas found displacement effects for seven of nine grassland bird species after one year. While these effects have been documented in various studies, they have yet to be broadly quantified.

When the aforementioned information is taken into account, it is evident that current estimates of the cost of wind energy development on birds are limited in scope and do not fully account for the industry’s effects.

Because the estimates above are based on studies that were derived from an incomplete data set, it should be noted that they are not perfect.

Although the majority of wind farms must carry out bird surveys in order to provide information for project planning and post-construction studies on bird mortality, these facilities are regrettably not always required to share the results of their surveys, and many businesses keep the data confidential. Public access to these data would improve understanding of bird mortality and allow for more customized conservation recommendations.

Equally important, we need to take into account the species that wind turbines are negatively affecting. Certain species are more vulnerable to wind turbine collisions than others, and because they reproduce more slowly, the losses they sustain may have a greater impact on their populations. This includes some of our rarest and most iconic species, like Marbled Murrelets and California Condors, which are in danger of colliding with wind turbines. Others, like Whooping Cranes, are losing their natural habitat due to the development of wind energy.

As previously mentioned, our estimates show that the annual loss of birds to the United S. at least 500,000 wind turbines; a similarly conservative estimate would place that figure closer to 700,000 birds. One could argue that the figure is higher than one million. And for all the previously mentioned reasons, these are probably all underestimates.

Whatever the details, given the numerous other threats to birds on the landscape and the significant declines in bird populations that we have already witnessed, this is far too many.

The answer to this paradox is bird-smart wind energy. How can we combat climate change while installing more wind turbines and endangering birds at the same time? The first steps in developing smart wind energy are gathering quality data and choosing a location that keeps birds out of high-risk areas. Then, feasible actions can be taken to further reduce risks, and effects must always be countered by effective on-the-ground mitigation strategies.

For more than ten years, American Bird Conservancy has worked to reduce the effects that wind energy development has on birds. We can realize the benefits of renewable energy while safeguarding our vulnerable bird populations if we make sure that this development is done correctly.

More From Bird Calls Blog

FAQ

Do windmills cause a majority of deaths of birds and bats?

Are windmills bad for the environment?

Are wind turbines friendlier to birds than oil and gas drilling?

How can we protect birds from wind turbines?